Hi Johannes, > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> This is not about the name that makes sense. I think using ethX names >> for wireless devices is utterly stupid, but it's what all current upstream >> drivers do, and at least for WE compat we'll have to stick to it. > > No, that's not true, zd1201 doesn't [1] :)
Neither does hostap [2] :) Thanks, Jochen [2] http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;h=ed00ebb6e7f4bd255d1a1fe8bf05a6f7a5574d6e;hb=aefba081d7b7dfd1c5752f6e6e709d8b5ab80ab7;f=drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c#l84 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
