On Monday 06 November 2006 09:59, Zhao Xiaoming wrote: > Thank you again for your help. To have more detailed statistic data, I > did another round of test and gathered some data. I give the overall > description here and detailed /proc/net/sockstat, /proc/meminfo, > /proc/slabinfo and /proc/buddyinfo follows. > ===================================================== > slab mem cost tcp mem pages lowmem > free with traffic: 254668KB 34693 > 38772KB > without traffic: 104080KB 1 > 702652KB > =====================================================
Thank you for detailed infos. It appears you have an extensive use of threads (about 10000), since : > task_struct 10095 10095 1360 3 1 : tunables 24 12 > 8 : slabdata 3365 3365 0 Each thread has a kernel stack, 8KB (ie 2 pages, order-1 allocation), plus a user vma > vm_area_struct 21346 21504 92 42 1 : tunables 120 60 > 8 : slabdata 512 512 0 Most likely you dont need that much threads. A program with fewer threads will perform better and use less ram. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
