On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 18:22 +0100, Eric Lemoine wrote: > Actually I don't understand the purpose of having dev_close() wait for > __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED to be cleared. An interrupt may arrive at any > time after it's cleared, and reset __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED. Can someone > explain please?
Further interrupts won't schedule poll because netif_rx_schedule_prep() checks for netif_running(). -- Maxime - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
