FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it.
But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or
"users don't care", which are two very different things...
Jeff
--- Begin Message ---
Jeff,
As PC300 is not being produced anymore, we decided that the best solution is to
remove its driver from the kernel. I will send you a patch to do so, as soon as
possible.
Best regards,
Daniela
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/1/2006 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; LKML; Andrew
Morton
Subject: wan/pc300 bug found
The following gcc warning indicates a bug:
drivers/net/wan/pc300_drv.c: In function 'cpc_open':
drivers/net/wan/pc300_drv.c:2870: warning: 'br' may be used uninitialized in
this function
clock_rate_calc() is not checked for a negative return value.
--- End Message ---
