On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 05:57:39PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:55 -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > > > ok. I am concerned that making this split between per driver and per > > card is difficult to get right. Setting or not setting a function > > pointer for an operation is fairly standard practice and I don't see > > the value in introducing yet another way to indicate support. > > I guess we can punt this patch until some driver shows up that actually > has some cards that need the function and some that don't. I'm actually > guessing such a driver won't exist but wanted this for completeness in > the split between _wiphy and _ops.
Perhaps that is a split that we do not need? I don't see the problem that 'd80211: split ieee80211_hw' is solving. I do see what it is doing, but maybe I am missing something . . . > > johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
