From: Wenji Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:08:22 -0600
> If the higher prioirty processes become runnable (e.g., interactive > process), you better yield the CPU, instead of continuing this process. If > it is the case that the process within tcp_recvmsg() is expriring, then, you > can continue the process to go ahead to process backlog. Yes, I understand this, and I made that point in one of my replies to Ingo Molnar last night. The only seemingly remaining possibility is to find a way to allow input packet processing, at least enough to emit ACKs, during tcp_recvmsg() processing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
