On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:05:08 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:44 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:15:46 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > After commit 69bd48404f25 ("net/sched: Remove egdev mechanism"),
> > > tc_setup_cb_call() is nearly identical to tcf_block_cb_call(),
> > > so we can just fold tcf_block_cb_call() into tc_setup_cb_call()
> > > and remove its unused parameter 'exts'.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 69bd48404f25 ("net/sched: Remove egdev mechanism")
> > > Cc: Oz Shlomo <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks, I didn't want to nit pick too much on Oz's patch :)
> >
> > The Fixes tag is superfluous, this is far from a bug, unnecessary noise
> > for backporters.
>
> Odd, you just Acked a patch which uses Fixes tag for a newline
> change:
>
> commit 10a5ce98539948affbdc28dc0f39a1b6b2307f9d
> Author: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon Dec 10 10:53:24 2018 -0800
>
> bpf: bpftool: Fix newline and p_err issue
>
> This patch fixes a few newline issues and also
> replaces p_err with p_info in prog.c
>
> Fixes: b053b439b72a ("bpf: libbpf: bpftool: Print bpf_line_info
> during prog dump")
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
>
> Jakub, please guide me which Jakub I should trust. :)
>
> Or you believe a newline change is more close to a bug fix
> than this?
>
> Please help!
p_err() breaks JSON so it's an actual bug.
