Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:10:39PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Well, but why getsockname() didn't just return ENOTCONN? > > It's perfectly valid to have a local port number without being connected.
Er. You're right - I was confusing getSOCKname() and getPEERname(). Still, after the connection has been closed, there's no chance to do anything with the filedescriptor but to close it as well, right? Or can the fd be reused by making new connection with it, as if it were just returned from socket() call? If it's the former, than there's no reason to assign new local address to it. /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
