From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:02:51 +0100
> So i'm wondering what other assumptions there are (or can be)
> about rcu_read_lock() also being a preempt-off point. Thanks!
I showed the examples in my detailed analysis yesterday.
Beause I love hearing myself say the same thing over and over so much
I'll restate it for you.
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c, calls:
l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find((u_int16_t)pf, protonum);
whichs assumes that preemption is disabled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
