On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 13:19 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > Because I've seen gcc optimize this properly before (at least on > sparc64), it means that either: > > 1) There is a GCC bug where the properties of the constants > do not propagate. > > 2) GCC really thinks the divide is cheaper (code density vs. > cycle count tradeoffs etc.) > > Anyways, we should probably apply your patch in any event. > > Michael, any objections? > No objections. I will create another patch to convert similar divisions in other spots.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
