In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:55:03 -0500), Neil Horman 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index 7b7bd44..8a1ea96 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,34 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct sock *sk,
>               err = ipv6_get_saddr(*dst, &fl->fl6_dst, &fl->fl6_src);
>               if (err)
>                       goto out_err_release;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD
> +             /*
> +              * Here if the dst entry we've looked up 
> +              * has a neighbour entry that is in the INCOMPLETE
> +              * state and the src address from the flow is 
> +              * marked as OPTIMISTIC, we release the found 
> +              * dst entry and replace it instead with the 
> +              * dst entry of the nexthop router
> +              */
> +             if (!((*dst)->neighbour->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
> +                     struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
> +                     struct flowi fl_gw;
> +                     ifp = ipv6_get_ifaddr(&fl->fl6_src, (*dst)->dev, 1);
> +
> +                     if (ifp && ifp->flags & IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC) {
> +                             /*
> +                              * We need to get the dst entry for the 
> +                              * default router instead
> +                              */
> +                             dst_release(*dst);
> +                             memcpy(&fl_gw, fl, sizeof(struct flowi));
> +                             memset(&fl_gw.fl6_dst, 0, sizeof(struct 
> in6_addr));
> +                             *dst = ip6_route_output(sk, &fl_gw);
> +                             if ((err = (*dst)->error))
> +                                     goto out_err_release;                   
>         
> +                     }
> +             }
> +#endif
>       }
>  
>       return 0;

Sorry, this is still not correct if the source address is already
specified.  I think they should be placed just betwee laste "}" and
"return 0;", no?


I still have a question.  Now, who will install the kernel route for
the incoming packet?  Can we get packet for our unicast address during
optimistic DAD period?

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to