Herbert Xu wrote: > Mike Accetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Obviously the code believes it can assume that there are always multiple >>sk_buff's in the chain. The stack trace seems to implicate iptables in >>the scenario (twice) if that means anything. Any ideas about what may >>be going wrong here? There is indeed a private module loaded at the time >>but it does no networking and I doubt it is the culprit. > > > Yeah we should never get here if we only have one segment. > Could you get it to print out the value of skb->gso_*?
The callpath shows the REJECT target sending a TCP reset. I'm guessing it has something to do with skb_copy_expand copying the gso fields. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
