On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:18 PM CEST, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:37:52AM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
[...]
>> ---
>> .../bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c | 21 +++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c
>> index 777faffc4639..1f51ba66b98b 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c
>> @@ -91,12 +91,18 @@ static void do_flow_dissector_reattach(void)
>>
>> void test_flow_dissector_reattach(void)
>> {
>> - int init_net, err;
>> + int init_net, self_net, err;
>> +
>> + self_net = open("/proc/self/ns/net", O_RDONLY);
>> + if (CHECK_FAIL(self_net < 0)) {
>> + perror("open(/proc/self/ns/net");
>> + return;
>> + }
>>
>> init_net = open("/proc/1/ns/net", O_RDONLY);
>> if (CHECK_FAIL(init_net < 0)) {
>> perror("open(/proc/1/ns/net)");
>> - return;
>> + goto out_close;
> Mostly nit. close(-1) is ok-ish... The same goes for the "out_close" in
> do_flow_dissector_reattach().
Happy to fix it up. Is your concern that calls to close invalid FDs
clutter strace output or something else?
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review.
-Jakub
