> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 7:26 AM > To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Roy Pledge > <[email protected]>; Laurentiu Tudor <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:27:51 +0000, Madalin-cristian Bucur wrote: > > Here's a series of changes for the DPAA Ethernet, addressing minor > > or unapparent issues in the codebase, adding probe ordering based on > > a recently added DPAA QMan API, removing some redundant code. > > Hi Madalin! > > Patch 2 looks like it may be a bug fix but I gather it has a dependency > in net-next so it can't go to net?
It's a fix for a theoretical issue that is not reproducing with the current code base. Future changes related to the IOMMU support may make this issue visible. > More importantly - I think your From: line on this posting is > > Madalin-cristian Bucur <[email protected]> > > While the sign-off on the patches you wrote is: > > Madalin Bucur <[email protected]> > > I think these gotta be identical otherwise the bots which ensure the > author added his sign-off may scream at us. The formatted patches look like this: >From 55a524a41099fa9b2f5fbbb9f3a87108437942bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Madalin Bucur <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:21:26 +0300 Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Reply-to: [email protected] but then there are some MS servers trying to be helpful and the message ends up like this: From: Madalin-cristian Bucur <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> CC: Roy Pledge <[email protected]>, Laurentiu Tudor <[email protected]>, Madalin-cristian Bucur <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes Thread-Index: AQHViAr0ehww7MPYPUqedXDa00qudg== X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:27:51 +0000 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Reply-To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <[email protected]> <snip> Return-Path: [email protected] It's probably a good time to think about pull requests...
