On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:52 PM David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/26/20 9:04 AM, William Tu wrote:
> > The Type I ERSPAN frame format is based on the barebones
> > IP + GRE(4-byte) encapsulation on top of the raw mirrored frame.
> > Both type I and II use 0x88BE as protocol type. Unlike type II
> > and III, no sequence number or key is required.
>
> should this be considered a bug fix or -next is what you prefer?
>
Hi David,
Since it's supporting a new type, I'd consider -next.
But either way is ok to me, I don't have have any preference.
Thanks!
William
