Le 05.06.2020 à 00:55, David Miller a écrit :
From: Valentin Longchamp <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:21:13 +0200Remove dev_watchdog_up() that directly called __netdev_watchdog_up() and rename dev_watchdog_down() to __netdev_watchdog_down() for symmetry. Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <[email protected]> --- net/sched/sch_generic.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c index 2efd5b61acef..f3cb740a2941 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c @@ -465,12 +465,7 @@ void __netdev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev) } }-static void dev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev)-{ - __netdev_watchdog_up(dev); -} - -static void dev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev) +static void __netdev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev)This patch will not apply if I apply your symbol export patch because the context above this function will be different. Please don't do this.
Yeah, I didn't know how to handle this properly: I kept both patches separated because the symbol export should go to stable and this one not.
Is that OK to have only a ("initial") subset of a series aimed for stable ?
