On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:31:19PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Oh, sorry for the typo, the numbers make me crazy, it should be only > > ingress i40e, egress veth. Here is the right description: > > > > Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e) > > xdp_redirect_map: > > generic mode: 1.9M PPS > > driver mode: 10.2M PPS > > > > xdp_redirect_map_multi: > > generic mode: 1.58M PPS > > driver mode: 7.16M PPS > > > > Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress veth(No XDP on peer)) > > xdp_redirect_map: > > generic mode: 2.2M PPS > > driver mode: 14.2M PPS > > A few messages up-thread you were getting 4.15M PPS in this case - what > changed? It's inconsistencies like these that make me suspicious of the > whole set of results :/
I got the number after a reboot, not sure what happened. And I also feel surprised... But the result shows the number, so I have to put it here. > > Are you getting these numbers from ethtool_stats.pl or from the XDP > program? What counter are you looking at, exactly? For bridge testing I use ethtool_stats.pl. For later xdp_redirect_map and xdp_redirect_map_multi testing, I checked that ethtool_stats.pl and XDP program shows the same number. When run ethtool_stats.pl the number will go a little bit slower. So at the end I use the xdp program's number. I'm going to re-setup the test environment and share it with you. Hope we could get a final number that we all accept. Thanks Hangbin
