On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:38 PM Yonghong Song <[email protected]> wrote: > > On my VM, I got identical results between /proc/net/udp[6] and > the udp{4,6} bpf iterator. > > For udp6: > $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/p1 > sl local_address remote_address > st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref > pointer drops > 1405: 000080FE00000000FF7CC4D0D9EFE4FE:0222 > 00000000000000000000000000000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 > 00000000 193 0 19183 2 0000000029eab111 0 > $ cat /proc/net/udp6 > sl local_address remote_address > st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref > pointer drops > 1405: 000080FE00000000FF7CC4D0D9EFE4FE:0222 > 00000000000000000000000000000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 > 00000000 193 0 19183 2 0000000029eab111 0 > > For udp4: > $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/p4 > sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt > uid timeout inode ref pointer drops > 2007: 00000000:1F90 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 > 00000000 0 0 72540 2 000000004ede477a 0 > $ cat /proc/net/udp > sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt > uid timeout inode ref pointer drops > 2007: 00000000:1F90 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 > 00000000 0 0 72540 2 000000004ede477a 0 > ---
patch subject prefix is misleading: tools/bpf -> selftests/bpf? Otherwise: Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 16 ++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_udp4.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_udp6.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_udp4.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_udp6.c > [...]
