Amit Kale wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 16:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Amit Kale wrote:
On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
Hi All,
I will be sending updates to NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet driver in
subsequent mails. The patches will be with respect to netdev#upstream.
Are you sure you don't want some of these in #upstream-fixes, queued for
2.6.21-rc?
We really want them in both places. If we send them to #upstream-fixes,
they'll break #upstream. Should we send them against both of these
branches?
Well, I can drop NetXen patches in #upstream, apply these to
#upstream-fixes, and wait for a resend?
Could you do that, please? (drop NetXen patches in #upstream)
We'll resend them against #upstream-fixes.
Will note.
Just to be clear, I presume that you will only be resending the bug
fixes against #upstream-fixes (2.6.21-rc). The multiple PCI function
stuff is way too big and invasive for 2.6.21-rc, which is why I
committed that to #upstream (2.6.22).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
