On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:01 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote > Please don't remove CCs. > > Denys wrote: > > 1024kb (if i am not wrong 1Mbyte) is huge? > > > > For me it is ok, as soon as i have RAM. > > Its not about the memory, its about the resulting queueing delay. > If you buffer packets for 64 seconds the sender will retransmit > them and you end up wasting bandwidth. > > > Another thing, it is working well > > with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second > > buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before? > > I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone > would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets > for up to 64 seconds? Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available, bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on "rate" speed. I am wrong? At least it was working like this before.
-- Virtual ISP S.A.L. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
