On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:00:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:33:56PM +0000, Madalin Bucur (OSS) wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 03 August 2020 15:58 > > > To: Madalin Bucur (OSS) <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <[email protected]>; Vikas Singh > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; Calvin Johnson (OSS) <[email protected]>; > > > kuldip dwivedi <[email protected]>; Vikas Singh > > > <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Associate device node with fixed PHY > > > > > > > I see you agree that there were and there will be many changes for a > > > while, > > > > It's not a complaint, I know hot it works, it's just a decision based on > > > > required effort vs features offered vs user requirements. Lately it's > > > been > > > > time consuming to try to fix things in this area. > > > > > > So the conclusion to all this that you are unwilling to use the > > > correct API for this, which would be phylink, and the SFP code. So: > > > > > > NACK > > > > > > Andrew > > > > You've rejected a generic change - ACPI support for fixed link. > > The discussion above is just an example of how it could have been > > (mis-)used. > > Are you rejecting the general case or just the particular one? > > So far, nobody has corrected me that the MAC is not connected to an > SFP socket. So i see two sorts of abuse going on here: > > 1) Using a fixed link with a hack to allow 10G. phylink allows 10G > fixed links without an hacks. > > 2) Using a fixed link when not even appropriate since phylink should > be used to control the SFP. > > Now, you can do whatever you want in your Vendor Crap tree. But there > is no reason mainline should help you support your vendor crap tree.
+1 for everything above. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
