Hi Mr. David 
    I have modified my patch according to you advice. I think -
EHOSTUNREACH 
is only for "input path". In "output" path, we can just simply check 
-ENETUNREACH  (^_^), the patch is shown in the end of this mail. 

BTW: my E-mail has been changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

>> Function need to fix: 
>> tcp_v4_connect(); ip4_datagram_connect(); udp_sendmsg(); 

> I think we need to make these checks more carefully. 
> 
> Route lookup can fail for several reasons other than 
> no route being available.  Two examples are: 
> 
> 1) Out of memory error while creating route 
> 2) IPSEC disallows communication to that flow ID 
> 
> As a result, we'll probably best limiting the counter 
> increment when the error is either -EHOSTUNREACH or 
> -ENETUNREACH. 

signed-off-by: Wei Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff -ruNp old/net/ipv4/datagram.c new/net/ipv4/datagram.c
--- old/net/ipv4/datagram.c     2007-03-27 18:15:56.000000000 +0800
+++ new/net/ipv4/datagram.c     2007-03-27 18:23:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -50,8 +50,12 @@ int ip4_datagram_connect(struct sock *sk
                               RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), oif,
                               sk->sk_protocol,
                               inet->sport, usin->sin_port, sk);
-       if (err)
+       if (err) {
+               if (err == -ENETUNREACH)
+                       IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                return err;
+       }
+
        if ((rt->rt_flags & RTCF_BROADCAST) && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_BROADCAST)) {
                ip_rt_put(rt);
                return -EACCES;
diff -ruNp old/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c new/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
--- old/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c     2007-03-27 18:15:56.000000000 +0800
+++ new/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c     2007-03-27 18:28:38.000000000 +0800
@@ -192,8 +192,11 @@ int tcp_v4_connect(struct sock *sk, stru
                               RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
                               IPPROTO_TCP,
                               inet->sport, usin->sin_port, sk);
-       if (tmp < 0)
+       if (tmp < 0) {
+               if (tmp == -ENETUNREACH)
+                       IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                return tmp;
+       }
 
        if (rt->rt_flags & (RTCF_MULTICAST | RTCF_BROADCAST)) {
                ip_rt_put(rt);
diff -ruNp old/net/ipv4/udp.c new/net/ipv4/udp.c
--- old/net/ipv4/udp.c  2007-03-27 18:15:56.000000000 +0800
+++ new/net/ipv4/udp.c  2007-03-27 18:26:47.000000000 +0800
@@ -630,8 +630,11 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, stru
                                                 .dport = dport } } };
                security_sk_classify_flow(sk, &fl);
                err = ip_route_output_flow(&rt, &fl, sk, 
!(msg->msg_flags&MSG_DONTWAIT));
-               if (err)
+               if (err) {
+                       if (err == -ENETUNREACH)
+                               IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
                        goto out;
+               }
 
                err = -EACCES;
                if ((rt->rt_flags & RTCF_BROADCAST) &&


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to