On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:09 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I know :) It was a few month ago when I noticed the new bonding > sysfs interface when I first thought that we really need this.
:) > > I don't think wireless can get away without a new tool. So much stuff > > there. Look at > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/nl80211.h;hb=HEAD > > > Maybe not wireless, but bonding, briding, vlan, etun, possibly more. Fair enough. Then the question however remains whether wireless should try to do all things it needs in one or try leveraging multiple things from other places. Thoughts? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
