On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:06:31PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> For the dup acks, I see nothing *but* dup acks on the wire...going in
> both directions interestingly, at greater than 100,000 packets per second.
>
> I don't mind adding printks...and I've started reading through the code,
> but there is a lot of it, and indiscriminate printks will likely just
> hide the problem because it will slow down performance so much.
What do the timestamps look like? PAWS contains logic which will drop
packets if the timestamps are too old compared to what the receiver
expects.
-ben
--
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
