Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> writes:
> +Petr
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> static int mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
>> const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
>> - struct switchdev_trans *trans,
>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
>> const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan;
>> + struct switchdev_trans trans;
>> int err = 0;
>>
>> switch (obj->id) {
>> case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
>> vlan = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
>> - err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, trans,
>> +
>
> Got the regression results. The call to mlxsw_sp_span_respin() should be
> placed here because it needs to be triggered regardless of the return
> value of mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add().
Agreed, the new code differs in that respin is not called on error path.
