On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 06:23:19PM +0800, menglong8.d...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Menglong Dong <dong.mengl...@zte.com.cn> > > For now, sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default are globally > unified. It's not convenient in some case. For example, when we > use docker and try to control the default udp socket receive buffer > for each container. > > For that reason, make sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default > per-namespace. > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.mengl...@zte.com.cn> > ---
Hey Menglong, I was about to review the two patches you sent: 1. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_rmem_max and sysctl_wmem_max https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117104743.217194-1-dong.mengl...@zte.com.cn 2. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117102319.193756-1-dong.mengl...@zte.com.cn and I had to spend some time figuring out that 2. is dependent on 1. I first thought I got the base wrong. I'd suggest you resend both patches as a part of a single series with a cover letter mentioning the goal and use-case for these changes and also pass --base=<base-commit> when creating the patch series which makes it way easier to figure out what to apply it to when wanting to review a series in the larger context of a tree. Thanks! Christian