sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c          | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 58b5a349d3ba..1512092e1e68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
        enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
        uint8_t flags;
        void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
-       uint8_t runs;
+       int runs;
 #define bpf_testdata_struct_t                                  \
        struct {                                                \
                uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;                 \
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool 
unpriv,
 
        run_errs = 0;
        run_successes = 0;
-       if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+       if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
                uint32_t expected_val;
                int i;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
index fb13ca2d5606..d78627be060f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
        .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+       .runs = -1,
 },
 /* invalid 8-byte reads from a 4-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to