From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
tasklet_kill() spin waits for TASKLET_STATE_SCHED to be cleared invoking
yield() from inside the loop. yield() is an ill defined mechanism and the
result might still be wasting CPU cycles in a tight loop which is
especially painful in a guest when the CPU running the tasklet is scheduled
out.
tasklet_kill() is used in teardown paths and not performance critical at
all. Replace the spin wait with wait_var_event().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -532,6 +532,16 @@ void __tasklet_hi_schedule(struct taskle
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tasklet_hi_schedule);
+static inline bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
+ wake_up_var(&t->state);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void tasklet_action_common(struct softirq_action *a,
struct tasklet_head *tl_head,
unsigned int softirq_nr)
@@ -551,8 +561,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct
if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
- if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED,
- &t->state))
+ if (!tasklet_clear_sched(t))
BUG();
if (t->use_callback)
t->callback(t);
@@ -612,13 +621,11 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct
if (in_interrupt())
pr_notice("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");
- while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
- do {
- yield();
- } while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
- }
+ while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
+ wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED,
&t->state));
+
tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
- clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state);
+ tasklet_clear_sched(t);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);
