On Mon, 2007-04-06 at 14:40 -0700, PJ Waskiewicz wrote: > API added to support multiple hardware queues on an ethernet device. > Round-robin scheduler added (sch_rr) to provide a no-scheduling policy > qdisc for hardware with multiple queues. >
>From a high level i see a good start that you at least have a separate qdisc. I dont see the need for making any subqueue semantics in the qdisc. We already have them. I also still dont see the need for the patching of the prio qdisc or the subqueue control. I am now uncertain that after all those discussions (and a lot other private ones) whether you understood me. We are still not meeting in the middle. Sorry, Peter i dont mean to rain on your parade but i cant let this just slide by[1]. So please give me sometime and this week i will send patches to demonstrate my view. I didnt mean to do that, but as i see it i have no other choice. BTW, wheres the e1000 change? cheers, jamal [1] If for example you wrote a classifier or a qdisc (as in a recent discussion I had with Patrick) i would say it is your code and your effort and i have the choice not to use it (by virtue of there being other alternatives). I have no such luxury but to use the changes you make to that code path whenever i use multi tx rings. PS:- It is polite to CC someone who has engaged you in a conversation; in particular as i have told you before at times i dont read netdev for days but read emails addressed to me even when busyed out or travelling. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
