On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 03:47:30PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:21 AM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Adding the test to re-attach (detach/attach again) tracing
> > fentry programs, plus check that already linked program can't
> > be attached again.
> >
> > Fixing the number of check-ed results, which should be 8.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c | 48 +++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
> > index 04ebbf1cb390..1f7566e772e9 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c
> > @@ -3,20 +3,24 @@
> > #include <test_progs.h>
> > #include "fentry_test.skel.h"
> >
> > -void test_fentry_test(void)
> > +static __u32 duration;
> > +
> > +static int fentry_test(struct fentry_test *fentry_skel)
> > {
> > - struct fentry_test *fentry_skel = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_link *link;
> > int err, prog_fd, i;
> > - __u32 duration = 0, retval;
> > __u64 *result;
> > -
> > - fentry_skel = fentry_test__open_and_load();
> > - if (CHECK(!fentry_skel, "fentry_skel_load", "fentry skeleton
> > failed\n"))
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + __u32 retval;
> >
> > err = fentry_test__attach(fentry_skel);
> > if (CHECK(err, "fentry_attach", "fentry attach failed: %d\n", err))
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + /* Check that already linked program can't be attached again. */
> > + link = bpf_program__attach(fentry_skel->progs.test1);
> > + if (CHECK(!IS_ERR(link), "fentry_attach_link",
>
> if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fentry_attach_link")) ?
ok
>
> > + "re-attach without detach should not succeed"))
> > + return -1;
> >
> > prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(fentry_skel->progs.test1);
> > err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, NULL, 0,
> > @@ -26,12 +30,36 @@ void test_fentry_test(void)
> > err, errno, retval, duration);
> >
> > result = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss;
> > - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>
> how about using sizeof(*fentry_skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64) ?
ok
>
> > if (CHECK(result[i] != 1, "result",
> > "fentry_test%d failed err %lld\n", i + 1,
> > result[i]))
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + return -1;
> > }
> >
> > + fentry_test__detach(fentry_skel);
> > +
> > + /* zero results for re-attach test */
> > + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> > + result[i] = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_fentry_test(void)
> > +{
> > + struct fentry_test *fentry_skel = NULL;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + fentry_skel = fentry_test__open_and_load();
> > + if (CHECK(!fentry_skel, "fentry_skel_load", "fentry skeleton
> > failed\n"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + err = fentry_test(fentry_skel);
> > + if (CHECK(err, "fentry_test", "first attach failed\n"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + err = fentry_test(fentry_skel);
> > + CHECK(err, "fentry_test", "second attach failed\n");
>
> overall: please try to use ASSERT_xxx macros, they are easier to
> follow and require less typing
ok, will check
thanks,
jirka
