Hi Anthony,
Thanks for reviewing!
> From: Nguyen, Anthony L [mailto:anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:41 PM
> To: da...@davemloft.net; k...@kernel.org; Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <jesse.brandeb...@intel.com>; linux...@openeuler.org; Tieman, Henry W
> <henry.w.tie...@intel.com>; Linuxarm <linux...@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Re-organizes reqstd/avail {R,T}XQ check/code for
> efficiency+readability
>
> On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 02:45 +0100, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > If user has explicitly requested the number of {R,T}XQs, then it is
> > unnecessary
> > to get the count of already available {R,T}XQs from the PF
> > avail_{r,t}xqs
> > bitmap. This value will get overriden by user specified value in any
>
> s/overriden/overridden
Ok.
>
> > case.
> >
> > This patch does minor re-organization of the code for improving the
> > flow and
> > readabiltiy. This scope of improvement was found during the review of
> > the ICE
> > driver code.
>
> The changes themselves look ok, but there are some checkpatch issues.
> Also, could you include intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org
Sure. will fix them.
>
> > FYI, I could not test this change due to unavailability of the
> > hardware. It
> > would helpful if somebody can test this and provide Tested-by Tag.
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > Fixes: 11b7551e096d ("ice: Implement ethtool ops for channels")
>
> This commit id doesn't exist.
Will fix. Sorry about this.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > index d13c7fc8fb0a..161e8dfe548c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > @@ -161,12 +161,13 @@ static void ice_vsi_set_num_qs(struct ice_vsi
> > *vsi, u16 vf_id)
> >
> > switch (vsi->type) {
> > case ICE_VSI_PF:
> > - vsi->alloc_txq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
> > - ice_get_avail_txq_count(pf),
> > - (u16)num_online_cpus());
> > if (vsi->req_txq) {
> > vsi->alloc_txq = vsi->req_txq;
> > vsi->num_txq = vsi->req_txq;
> > + } else {
> > + vsi->alloc_txq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
> > + ice_get_avail_txq_count(pf),
> > + (u16)num_online_cpus());
>
> Alignment is incorrect.
Ok. Will check, perhaps the cause of the checkpatch.pl errors.
>
> > }
> >
> > pf->num_lan_tx = vsi->alloc_txq;
> > @@ -175,12 +176,13 @@ static void ice_vsi_set_num_qs(struct ice_vsi
> > *vsi, u16 vf_id)
> > if (!test_bit(ICE_FLAG_RSS_ENA, pf->flags)) {
> > vsi->alloc_rxq = 1;
> > } else {
> > - vsi->alloc_rxq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
> > - ice_get_avail_rxq_count(p
> > f),
> > - (u16)num_online_cpus());
> > if (vsi->req_rxq) {
> > vsi->alloc_rxq = vsi->req_rxq;
> > vsi->num_rxq = vsi->req_rxq;
> > + } else {
> > + vsi->alloc_rxq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
> > + ice_get_avail_rxq_coun
> > t(pf),
> > + (u16)num_online_cpus()
>
> Same, alignment is incorrect.
Ok. Will fix.
Thanks
Salil.
