On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:47 AM Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> > @@ -1381,25 +1382,12 @@ static struct eth_plat_info
> > *ixp4xx_of_get_platdata(struct device *dev)
> > /* NPE ID 0x00, 0x10, 0x20... */
> > plat->npe = (val << 4);
> >
> > - phy_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0);
> > - if (phy_np) {
> > - ret = of_property_read_u32(phy_np, "reg", &val);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "cannot find phy reg\n");
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > - of_node_put(phy_np);
> > - } else {
> > - dev_err(dev, "cannot find phy instance\n");
> > - val = 0;
> > - }
> > - plat->phy = val;
> > -
>
> Isn't this code you just added in the previous patch?
Yep. It's by the token of "one technical step per patch" but I
suggested that maybe you prefer to take two technical
steps in one big patch, then we can just squash
patches 2 & 3. I'll fix it as you want it just tell me how :)
> > - snprintf(phy_id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE + 3, PHY_ID_FMT,
> > - mdio_bus->id, plat->phy);
> > - phydev = phy_connect(ndev, phy_id, &ixp4xx_adjust_link,
> > - PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> > + if (np) {
> > + phydev = of_phy_get_and_connect(ndev, np, ixp4xx_adjust_link);
> > + } else {
> > + snprintf(phy_id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE + 3, PHY_ID_FMT,
> > + mdio_bus->id, plat->phy);
>
> mdiobus_get_phy() and phy_connect_direct() might be better.
Do you mean for the legacy code path (else clause), or the
new code path with of_phy_get_and_connect() or both?
I tried not to change the legacy code in order to not introduce
regressions, so if I change that I suppose it should be a
separate patch.
On the other hand this driver has not been much maintained
the recent years so we might need to be a bit rough when
bringing it into shape. (After migrating all of IXP4xx to
device tree a lot of the legacy code will eventually be deleted.)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
