On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 17:21 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:43:49AM -0400, jamal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Folks, we need help. Please run this on different hardware. Evgeniy, i > > thought this kind of stuff excites you, no? ;-> (wink, wink). > > Only the sender needs the patch but the receiver must be a more powerful > > machine (so that it is not the bottleneck). > > I've ran several simple tests with desktop e1000 adapter I managed to > find. > > Test machine is amd athlon64 3500+ with 1gb of ram. > Another point is dektop core duo 3.4 ghz with 2 gb of ram and sky2 > driver. > > Simple test included test -> desktop and vice versa traffic with 128 and > 4096 block size in netperf-2.4.3 setup.
Is that in conjunction with setting the test-specific -D to set TCP_NODELAY, or was Nagle left-on? If the latter, perhaps timing issues could be why the confidence intervals weren't hit since the relative batching of 128byte sends into larger segments is something of a race. rick jones - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
