If the device does not respond to a request for a long time,
then control vq polling elevates CPU utilization, a problem that
exacerbates with more command requests.

Enabling control vq's irq is advantageous for the guest, and
this still doesn't support concurrent requests.

This code is basically from Jason:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230413064027.13267-3-jasow...@redhat.com/

Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hen...@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 4a802c0ea2cb..9b556ce89546 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
        /* Lock to protect the control VQ */
        struct mutex cvq_lock;
 
+       /* Wait for the device to complete the cvq request. */
+       struct completion completion;
+
        /* Host can handle any s/g split between our header and packet data */
        bool any_header_sg;
 
@@ -664,6 +667,13 @@ static bool virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct 
*napi,
        return false;
 }
 
+static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
+{
+       struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
+
+       complete(&vi->completion);
+}
+
 static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
 {
        struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
@@ -2721,14 +2731,8 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct 
virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
        if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq)))
                goto unlock;
 
-       /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping
-        * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
-        */
-       while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
-              !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
-               cond_resched();
-               cpu_relax();
-       }
+       wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
+       virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
 
 unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
@@ -5312,7 +5316,7 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 
        /* Parameters for control virtqueue, if any */
        if (vi->has_cvq) {
-               callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = NULL;
+               callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_done;
                names[total_vqs - 1] = "control";
        }
 
@@ -5832,6 +5836,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
        if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report)
                virtnet_init_default_rss(vi);
 
+       init_completion(&vi->completion);
        enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
 
        /* serialize netdev register + virtio_device_ready() with ndo_open() */
-- 
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f


Reply via email to