On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:05:30 +0800, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:15 PM Heng Qi <hen...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, control vq handles commands synchronously,
> > leading to increased delays for dim commands during multi-queue
> > VM configuration and directly impacting dim performance.
> >
> > To address this, we are shifting to asynchronous processing of
> > ctrlq's dim commands.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hen...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 208 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index e59e12bb7601..0338528993ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -376,6 +376,13 @@ struct control_buf {
> > struct completion completion;
> > };
> >
> > +struct virtnet_coal_node {
> > + struct control_buf ctrl;
> > + struct virtio_net_ctrl_coal_vq coal_vqs;
> > + bool is_coal_wait;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct virtnet_info {
> > struct virtio_device *vdev;
> > struct virtqueue *cvq;
> > @@ -420,6 +427,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > /* Lock to protect the control VQ */
> > struct mutex cvq_lock;
> >
> > + /* Work struct for acquisition of cvq processing results. */
> > + struct work_struct get_cvq;
> > +
> > /* Host can handle any s/g split between our header and packet data
> > */
> > bool any_header_sg;
> >
> > @@ -464,6 +474,14 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_tx;
> > struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_rx;
> >
> > + /* Free nodes used for concurrent delivery */
> > + struct mutex coal_free_lock;
> > + struct list_head coal_free_list;
> > +
> > + /* Filled when there are no free nodes or cvq buffers */
> > + struct mutex coal_wait_lock;
> > + struct list_head coal_wait_list;
> > +
> > unsigned long guest_offloads;
> > unsigned long guest_offloads_capable;
> >
> > @@ -670,7 +688,7 @@ static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
> > {
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
> >
> > - complete(&vi->ctrl->completion);
> > + schedule_work(&vi->get_cvq);
> > }
> >
> > static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > @@ -2696,7 +2714,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> > struct scatterlist *in)
> > {
> > struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat;
> > - u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0;
> > + u32 out_num = 0, in_num = 0;
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* Caller should know better */
> > @@ -2730,14 +2748,14 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > - if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq)))
> > - goto unlock;
> > + if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq))) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> >
> > - wait_for_completion(&vi->ctrl->completion);
> > - virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
> > + wait_for_completion(&ctrl->completion);
> >
> > -unlock:
> > - mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > return ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2747,6 +2765,86 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info
> > *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> > return virtnet_send_command_reply(vi, class, cmd, vi->ctrl, out,
> > NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +static void virtnet_process_dim_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *node)
> > +{
> > + u16 qnum = le16_to_cpu(node->coal_vqs.vqn) / 2;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->rq[qnum].dim_lock);
> > + vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_usecs =
> > + le32_to_cpu(node->coal_vqs.coal.max_usecs);
> > + vi->rq[qnum].intr_coal.max_packets =
> > + le32_to_cpu(node->coal_vqs.coal.max_packets);
> > + vi->rq[qnum].dim.state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->rq[qnum].dim_lock);
> > +
> > + if (node->is_coal_wait) {
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > + list_del(&node->list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > + kfree(node);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > + list_add(&node->list, &vi->coal_free_list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtnet_add_dim_command(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *coal_node)
> > +{
> > + struct scatterlist sg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + sg_init_one(&sg, &coal_node->coal_vqs, sizeof(coal_node->coal_vqs));
> > + ret = virtnet_send_command_reply(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL,
> > + VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET,
> > + &coal_node->ctrl, &sg, NULL);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,
> > + "Failed to change coalescing params.\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + virtnet_process_dim_cmd(vi, coal_node);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtnet_get_cvq_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct virtnet_info *vi =
> > + container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, get_cvq);
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *wait_coal;
> > + bool valid = false;
> > + unsigned int tmp;
> > + void *res;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > + while ((res = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp)) != NULL) {
> > + complete((struct completion *)res);
> > + valid = true;
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
>
> How could we synchronize with the device in this case?
>
> E.g what happens if the device finishes another buf here?
That's a good question. I think we can solve it using the following snippet?
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index e59e12bb7601..5dc3e1244016 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -420,6 +427,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
/* Lock to protect the control VQ */
struct mutex cvq_lock;
+ /* Atomic to confirm whether the cvq work is scheduled. */
+ atomic_t scheduled;
+
+ /* Work struct for acquisition of cvq processing results. */
+ struct work_struct get_cvq;
+
@@ -670,7 +691,9 @@ static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
- complete(&vi->ctrl->completion);
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(cvq);
+ if (!atomic_xchg(&vi->scheduled, 1))
+ schedule_work(&vi->get_cvq);
}
+static void virtnet_get_cvq_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct virtnet_info *vi =
+ container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, get_cvq);
+ struct virtnet_coal_node *wait_coal;
+ bool valid = false;
+ unsigned int tmp;
+ void *res;
+
+ mutex_lock(&vi->cvq_lock);
+ while ((res = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp)) != NULL) {
+ complete((struct completion *)res);
+ valid = true;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
+
+ atomic_set(&vi->scheduled, 0);
+ virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(vi->cvq);
+}
>
> > +
> > + if (!valid)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + while (true) {
> > + wait_coal = NULL;
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > + if (!list_empty(&vi->coal_wait_list))
> > + wait_coal = list_first_entry(&vi->coal_wait_list,
> > + struct
> > virtnet_coal_node,
> > + list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > + if (wait_coal)
> > + if (virtnet_add_dim_command(vi, wait_coal))
> > + break;
> > + else
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> This is still an ad-hoc optimization for dim in the general path here.
>
> Could we have a fn callback so for non dim it's just a completion and
> for dim it would be a schedule_work()?
>
OK, I will try this.
And how about this :
+static void virtnet_cvq_work_sched(struct virtqueue *cvq)
+{
+ struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
+
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(cvq);
+ if (!atomic_xchg(&vi->scheduled, 1))
+ schedule_work(&vi->get_cvq);
+}
+
static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
+ unsigned int tmp;
+ virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
complete(&vi->ctrl->completion);
}
@@ -5318,7 +5472,11 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
/* Parameters for control virtqueue, if any */
if (vi->has_cvq) {
- callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_done;
+ if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
+ callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_work_sched;
+ else
+ callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_done;
+
names[total_vqs - 1] = "control";
}
> > +}
> > static int virtnet_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
> > {
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > @@ -4398,35 +4496,73 @@ static int virtnet_send_notf_coal_vq_cmds(struct
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void virtnet_put_wait_coal(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct receive_queue *rq,
> > + struct dim_cq_moder moder)
> > +{
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *wait_node;
> > +
> > + wait_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*wait_node), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!wait_node) {
> > + rq->dim.state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + wait_node->is_coal_wait = true;
> > + wait_node->coal_vqs.vqn = cpu_to_le16(rxq2vq(rq - vi->rq));
> > + wait_node->coal_vqs.coal.max_usecs = cpu_to_le32(moder.usec);
> > + wait_node->coal_vqs.coal.max_packets = cpu_to_le32(moder.pkts);
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > + list_add_tail(&wait_node->list, &vi->coal_wait_list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> > struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> > struct receive_queue, dim);
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > - struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *avail_coal;
> > struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> > - int qnum, err;
> >
> > - qnum = rq - vi->rq;
> > + update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> > dim->profile_ix);
> >
> > mutex_lock(&rq->dim_lock);
> > - if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > - update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> > dim->profile_ix);
> > - if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> > - update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> > - err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> > - update_moder.usec,
> > - update_moder.pkts);
> > - if (err)
> > - pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters on
> > rxq%d\n",
> > - dev->name, qnum);
> > - dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> > + if (!rq->dim_enabled ||
> > + (update_moder.usec == rq->intr_coal.max_usecs &&
> > + update_moder.pkts == rq->intr_coal.max_packets)) {
> > + rq->dim.state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> > + mutex_unlock(&rq->dim_lock);
> > + return;
> > }
> > -out:
> > mutex_unlock(&rq->dim_lock);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > + if (vi->cvq->num_free < 3) {
> > + virtnet_put_wait_coal(vi, rq, update_moder);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Could we simply sleep instead of using a list here?
Do you mean using a semaphore, or a waitqueue?
>
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > + if (list_empty(&vi->coal_free_list)) {
> > + virtnet_put_wait_coal(vi, rq, update_moder);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + avail_coal = list_first_entry(&vi->coal_free_list,
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node, list);
> > + avail_coal->coal_vqs.vqn = cpu_to_le16(rxq2vq(rq - vi->rq));
> > + avail_coal->coal_vqs.coal.max_usecs =
> > cpu_to_le32(update_moder.usec);
> > + avail_coal->coal_vqs.coal.max_packets =
> > cpu_to_le32(update_moder.pkts);
> > +
> > + list_del(&avail_coal->list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > +
> > + virtnet_add_dim_command(vi, avail_coal);
> > }
> >
> > static int virtnet_coal_params_supported(struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
> > @@ -4839,6 +4975,7 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device
> > *vdev)
> > flush_work(&vi->config_work);
> > disable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > flush_work(&vi->rx_mode_work);
> > + flush_work(&vi->get_cvq);
> >
> > netif_tx_lock_bh(vi->dev);
> > netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> > @@ -5612,6 +5749,45 @@ static const struct xdp_metadata_ops
> > virtnet_xdp_metadata_ops = {
> > .xmo_rx_hash = virtnet_xdp_rx_hash,
> > };
> >
> > +static void virtnet_del_coal_free_list(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *coal_node, *tmp;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(coal_node, tmp, &vi->coal_free_list,
> > list) {
> > + list_del(&coal_node->list);
> > + kfree(coal_node);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtnet_init_coal_list(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + struct virtnet_coal_node *coal_node;
> > + int batch_dim_nums;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vi->coal_free_list);
> > + mutex_init(&vi->coal_free_lock);
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vi->coal_wait_list);
> > + mutex_init(&vi->coal_wait_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + batch_dim_nums = min((unsigned int)vi->max_queue_pairs,
> > + virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->cvq) / 3);
> > + for (i = 0; i < batch_dim_nums; i++) {
> > + coal_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*coal_node), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!coal_node) {
> > + virtnet_del_coal_free_list(vi);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + list_add(&coal_node->list, &vi->coal_free_list);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > {
> > int i, err = -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -5797,6 +5973,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > if (err)
> > goto free;
> >
> > + if (virtnet_init_coal_list(vi))
> > + goto free;
> > +
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL)) {
> > vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs = 0;
> > vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs = 0;
> > @@ -5838,6 +6017,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report)
> > virtnet_init_default_rss(vi);
> >
> > + INIT_WORK(&vi->get_cvq, virtnet_get_cvq_work);
> > init_completion(&vi->ctrl->completion);
> > enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> >
> > @@ -5967,11 +6147,14 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device
> > *vdev)
> > flush_work(&vi->config_work);
> > disable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > flush_work(&vi->rx_mode_work);
> > + flush_work(&vi->get_cvq);
>
> Do we need to prevent cvq work from being scheduled here?
You are right, I'll fix in the next version.
Thanks!
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > unregister_netdev(vi->dev);
> >
> > net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
> >
> > + virtnet_del_coal_free_list(vi);
> > +
> > remove_vq_common(vi);
> >
> > free_netdev(vi->dev);
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
>
