On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:20:44 +0200, Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 15:56 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > @@ -1032,6 +1034,53 @@ static void check_sq_full_and_disable(struct
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void sg_fill_dma(struct scatterlist *sg, dma_addr_t addr, u32 len)
> > +{
> > + sg->dma_address = addr;
> > + sg->length = len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct
> > receive_queue *rq,
> > + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_buff **xsk_buffs;
> > + dma_addr_t addr;
> > + u32 len, i;
> > + int err = 0;
>
> Minor nit: the reverse xmas tree order is based on the full line len,
> should be:
> int err = 0;
> u32 len, i;
Will fix.
>
> [...]
> > @@ -2226,6 +2281,7 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > struct receive_queue *rq,
> > u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&rq->stats.syncp, flags);
> > }
> >
> > + oom = err == -ENOMEM;
> > return !oom;
>
> Minor nit: 'oom' is used only in the above to lines. You could drop
> such variable and just:
> return err != -ENOMEM;
Will fix.
>
> Please _do not_ repost just for the above, but please include such
> changes if you should repost for other reasons.
OK.
>
> Also try to include a detailed changelog in each patch after the tag
> area and a '---' separator, it will simplify the review process.
Will do.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
