On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:22:43 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 11:03 AM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:17:30 +0800 Di Zhu wrote: > > > Negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS indicates the device > > > allows control over offload support, but the offloads that can be > > > controlled may have nothing to do with GRO (e.g., if neither GUEST_TSO4 > > > nor GUEST_TSO6 is supported). > > > > > > In such a setup, reporting NETIF_F_GRO_HW as available for the device > > > is too optimistic and misleading to the user. > > > > > > Improve the situation by masking off NETIF_F_GRO_HW unless the device > > > possesses actual GRO-related offload capabilities. Out of an abundance > > > of caution, this does not change the current behaviour for hardware with > > > just v6 or just v4 GRO: current interfaces do not allow distinguishing > > > between v6/v4 GRO, so we can't expose them to userspace precisely. > > > > Michael, Jason, does this patch look good now? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > Yes, I've acked.
Obrigado!
