[PATCH 3/4] net: make forcedeth to use kmalloc_node and __netdev_alloc_skb for 
skb allocation

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
index 42ba1c0..aa188f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
@@ -1383,7 +1383,8 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
                less_rx = np->last_rx.orig;
 
        while (np->put_rx.orig != less_rx) {
-               struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + 
NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
+               struct sk_buff *skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, np->rx_buf_sz +
+                                               NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, GFP_ATOMIC);
                if (skb) {
                        np->put_rx_ctx->skb = skb;
                        np->put_rx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev,
@@ -1415,7 +1416,8 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev)
                less_rx = np->last_rx.ex;
 
        while (np->put_rx.ex != less_rx) {
-               struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(np->rx_buf_sz + 
NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD);
+               struct sk_buff *skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, np->rx_buf_sz +
+                                               NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD, GFP_ATOMIC);
                if (skb) {
                        np->put_rx_ctx->skb = skb;
                        np->put_rx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev,
@@ -3976,8 +3978,10 @@ static int nv_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev, 
struct ethtool_ringparam* ri
                                            sizeof(struct ring_desc_ex) * 
(ring->rx_pending + ring->tx_pending),
                                            &ring_addr);
        }
-       rx_skbuff = kmalloc(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * ring->rx_pending, 
GFP_KERNEL);
-       tx_skbuff = kmalloc(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * ring->tx_pending, 
GFP_KERNEL);
+       rx_skbuff = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * ring->rx_pending,
+                                GFP_KERNEL, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
+       tx_skbuff = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * ring->tx_pending,
+                                GFP_KERNEL, dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
        if (!rxtx_ring || !rx_skbuff || !tx_skbuff) {
                /* fall back to old rings */
                if (np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_1 || np->desc_ver == DESC_VER_2) {
@@ -4372,7 +4376,7 @@ static int nv_loopback_test(struct net_device *dev)
 
        /* setup packet for tx */
        pkt_len = ETH_DATA_LEN;
-       tx_skb = dev_alloc_skb(pkt_len);
+       tx_skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, pkt_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
        if (!tx_skb) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "dev_alloc_skb() failed during loopback test"
                         " of %s\n", dev->name);
@@ -4976,6 +4980,8 @@ static int __devinit nv_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, 
const struct pci_device_i
        dev->base_addr = (unsigned long)np->base;
 
        dev->irq = pci_dev->irq;
+       printk(KERN_INFO "nv_probe: numa_node : %02d\n",
+               dev_to_node(&pci_dev->dev));
 
        np->rx_ring_size = RX_RING_DEFAULT;
        np->tx_ring_size = TX_RING_DEFAULT;
@@ -4995,8 +5001,11 @@ static int __devinit nv_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, 
const struct pci_device_i
                        goto out_unmap;
                np->tx_ring.ex = &np->rx_ring.ex[np->rx_ring_size];
        }
-       np->rx_skb = kmalloc(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * np->rx_ring_size, 
GFP_KERNEL);
-       np->tx_skb = kmalloc(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * np->tx_ring_size, 
GFP_KERNEL);
+       np->rx_skb = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * np->rx_ring_size,
+                                 GFP_KERNEL, dev_to_node(&pci_dev->dev));
+       np->tx_skb = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * np->tx_ring_size,
+                                 GFP_KERNEL, dev_to_node(&pci_dev->dev));
+
        if (!np->rx_skb || !np->tx_skb)
                goto out_freering;
        memset(np->rx_skb, 0, sizeof(struct nv_skb_map) * np->rx_ring_size);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to