Stephen Hemminger writes:
> I don't have a machine with anywhere near enough routes to test this,
> so would someone with many routes give it a go and make sure nothing
> got busted in the process.
Hello!
It's not only the numbers of routes thats important...
Anyway I've done what can to verify that route selection (comparing
lookups via netlink and userland longest-prefix-match using the same
full routing table) and locking (concurrent rDoS on multiple CPU:s
also while loading the full routing table) is intact.
Keep TKEY_GET_MASK in patch #2 as it gives some hint whats going on.
And how about Paul E. McKenney comment about rcu_dereference()
covering the initial fetch?
BTW. Right now the lab is setup for tests described above...
Cheers.
--ro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
