Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cpu_relax() contains a barrier, so it should do the right thing. For > non-smp architectures, I'm concerned about interacting with interrupt > handlers. Some drivers do use atomic_* operations.
What problems with interrupt handlers? Access to int/long must be atomic or we're in big trouble anyway. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
