On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:12:41 +0200 Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >> > >>>> Why does this add a new ip subcommand instead and uses genetlink > >>>> instead of the rtnl_link API, which was introduced exactly for > >>>> this stuff? > >>>> > >>> Hm... It does not, it just adds a parser for veth commands that > >>> generic layer isn't aware of. > >> > >> It does, you have "ip veth add", "ip veth del", ... > >> > >> Didn't you already sent a patch that used "ip link add ..."? > > > > The patch I sent last used "ip link add" and "ip link del". > > The link_veth.c file only parses all the extra arguments. > > > Thats what I thought. I seems Stephen applied an old version of > the patch that still uses genetlink. > Send me a new one, and I'll revert the old one. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
