Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Am I guessing right that the intention is to resurrect the ATM patch? > > > Yes, you are right. > Remember, Jamal ACKed the patch, and you redrew your NAK.
Mainly out of frustration/boredom with the discussion, I withdrew that again later and even Russell agreed that this should be done differently. > This is not a ATM/ADSL only patch. This patch simply adds more > flexibility to the rate tables. Afterwards we can start the discussion > about how to use this new flexibility in tc/iproute2. I know, but that discussion should happen *before* merging any changes to the kernel. Its pointless to add functionality that won't be used afterwards or may need to be done differently. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
