From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 11:48:45 -0400

> I wanted to get rid of the extrenous cpu arguement and ended moving this
> to the header files since it looks common enough an operation that could
> be used elsewhere.
> It is a trivial change - i could resend with leaving it in dev.c and
> just getting rid of the cpu arguement.

The only reason the cpu argument is superfluous is because
we don't provide a way to pass it on down to netif_tx_lock().

So instead netif_tx_lock() recomputes that value in this case which is
extra unnecessary work.

I would instead suggest, in netdevice.h:

static inline void __netif_tx_lock(struct net_device *dev, int cpu)
{
        spin_lock(&dev->_xmit_lock);
        dev->xmit_lock_owner = cpu;
}

static inline void netif_tx_lock(struct net_device *dev)
{
        __netif_tx_lock(dev, smp_processor_id());
}

And make the HARD_TX_LOCK() call __netif_tx_lock() and pass in
the already computed 'cpu' parameter.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to