On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > After rethinking, it looks like this last cancel should be useless. > So, if phy_interrupt() schedules only if !PHY_HALTED and phy_change() > does enable_irq() with no exeptions, it seems phy_interrupt() even > without lock must see PHY_HALTED state before this free_irq() with > possible DEBUG_SHIRQ call, then maybe only this safety: > > WARN_ON(work_pending(&phydev->phy_queue));
Good point. Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
