From: Stefan Rompf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:39:07 +0100
> I'd strongly suggest doing so. AFAIK, behaviour of connect() on nonblocking > sockets is quite well defined in POSIX. You are entitled to your opinion. POSIX says nothing about the semantics of route resolution. Non-blocking doesn't mean "cannot sleep no matter what". > If this is changed for some IP sockets, event-driven applications > will randomly and subtly break. If this was such a clear cut case we'd have changed things a long time ago, but it isn't so don't pretend this is the case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
