On Thursday 20 December 2007 3:00:09 am David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500 > > > The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty > > trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth > > merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit it > > for 2.6.25. > > Where is that patch? Or do you mean the fix you emailed > seperately today (which I will apply, thanks)?
Yes, it was the patch you applied, "XFRM: Audit function arguments misordered". I was using stacked-git to post the patch and it apparently doesn't annotate the cover email's subject line with "0/1" when you only send one patch. Sorry about that. > > As a side note, I'm unable to actually test the patch because I can't get > > the kernel to compile (M=net/xfrm works just fine). The problem I keep > > seeing is below: > > > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target \ > > `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/include/linux/ticable.h', \ > > needed by \ > > `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/usr/include/linux/ticable.h'. > > \ Stop. > > Remove ticable.h from include/linux/Kbuild > > This is already cured in Linus's tree. Noted, thanks. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
