On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:46:45PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Well, we call rcu_read_unlock_bh()/rcu_read_lock_bh() for each bucket, > empty or not, before and after patch, so we dont change latency.
Oh I see. Your patch looks good then. But we still need a solution in general unless we're to avoid all uses of conditional locking. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
