On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:17:09PM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > > Agreed. And despite Herbert's opinion that this isn't the correct fix, > I think this will work fine. This is one of the cases where we can take > a write_lock(bond->lock) in softirq context, so we need to drop that (or > make sure all the read_lock's are read_lock_bh's). The latter isn't > really an option since having a majority of the bonding code run in > softirq context was what we are trying to avoid with the workqueue > conversion.
No that's not the point. The point is to move the majority of the code into process context so that you can take the RTNL. Once you have taken the RTNL you can disable BH all you want and I don't care one bit. In any case, fixing a known dead-lock is important. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
