Thanks Kumar/Morton/Kim I shall make a small paragraph which describes the TDM driver architecture and the interfaces it exposes.
As far as 8315 TDM is concerned it is a non QE driver and quite different from this except for the functionality and external interface it exposes. Right now TDM is not a full-fledged bus driver which probably can be done may be very similar to SPI. Please give your suggestions on this. With Regards Poonam -----Original Message----- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:01 AM To: Andrew Morton Cc: Phillips Kim; Aggrwal Poonam; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barkowski Michael; Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600 > Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700 >> "Aggrwal Poonam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hello All >>> >>> I am waiting for more feedback on the patches. >>> >>> If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25. >>> >> if this isn't going to go through Alessandro Rubini/misc drivers, can >> it go through the akpm/mm tree? >> > > That would work. But it might be more appropriate to go Kumar- > >paulus->Linus. I'm ok w/taking the arch/powerpc bits, but I"m a bit concerned about the driver itself. I'm wondering if we need a TDM framework in the kernel. I guess if Poonam could possibly describe how this driver is actually used that would be helpful. I see we have 8315 with a discrete TDM block and I'm guessing 82xx/85xx based CPM parts of some form of TDM as well. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
