Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:18:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu: > >> These two functions are the same except for what they call > >> to "check_established" and "hash" for a socket. > >> > >> This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6. > > > > Good stuff! > > > > Yesterday I was perusing tcp_hash and I think we could have the hashinfo > > pointer stored perhaps in sk->sk_prot. > > > > That way we would be able to kill tcp_hash(), inet_put_port() could > > receive just sk, etc. > > But each proto will still have its own hashfn, so proto's > callbacks will be called to hash/unhash sockets, so this will > give us just one extra dereference. No? > > > What do you think? > > Hmmm... Even raw_hash, etc may become simpler. On the other hand > maybe this is a good idea, but I'm not very common with this code > yet to foresee such things in advance... I think that we should > try to prepare a patch and look, but if you have smth ready, then > it's better to review your stuff first.
gimme some minutes - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
